3 Flying Monkey Phrases Dr. Ramani Warns About

Most people never notice flying monkey phrases—or DARVO—in the moment. Learn 3 exact lines to spot.

Memory isn’t just a personal record; it’s a battlefield. If you’ve ever found yourself doubting what you know happened—especially after a difficult family dinner or a tense conversation—there’s a reason. Narcissistic abusers rarely work alone. Instead, they recruit so-called “flying monkeys” to do their bidding, sowing confusion and self-doubt in those they target. Psychologist Dr. Ramani Durvasula warns about these accomplices: people who echo the abuser’s distortions, making you question your own memories and reality. This article unpacks the subtle but devastating phrases flying monkeys use to rewrite your past right in front of you. You’ll see how these tactics operate, the psychological research behind them, and—most important—what you can do to protect your sense of truth.

The Flying Monkey Phenomenon in Narcissistic Abuse

Flying monkeys aren’t a myth from children’s stories—they’re a chilling reality in many abusive dynamics. Coined by Dr. George Simon in his book In Sheep’s Clothing, the term refers to abuser-enablers who act on behalf of a manipulator, often without realizing the harm they cause. These individuals parrot the abuser’s narrative, confronting the target with phrases that undermine their confidence and memory.

Consider this: after a heated argument with your sibling, your cousin chimes in at dinner, saying, “Are you sure that happened?” The intent is subtle but sharp—it’s not to clarify, but to cast doubt. Dr. Ramani Durvasula, a renowned psychologist, highlights how these moments of collective reality-twisting leave victims isolated, confused, and easy to control. Flying monkeys, emboldened by groupthink and loyalty, export the abuser’s gaslighting, making the victim question what was once clear.

Classic Phrases: How Doubt Is Engineered

Not all invalidation sounds overtly hostile. Dr. Ramani identifies three common phrases: “Are you sure that happened?” “Maybe you misunderstood,” and “You’re being too sensitive.” Each is a masterstroke of plausible deniability. Imagine disclosing to an aunt that you felt dismissed by another family member. She responds, “Maybe you misunderstood.” Suddenly, the ground shifts beneath your feet—was it all a misreading?

This is textbook gaslighting, a term first introduced in the 1938 play Gas Light and later studied by Dr. Robin Stern in The Gaslight Effect. By seeding doubt, flying monkeys disrupt your self-trust. Their language is carefully couched—never an outright accusation, but an insinuation that your memory is faulty or your emotions are overblown. The message is clear: don’t trust yourself. That’s fertile ground for ongoing control.

The Power of Collective Reality Distortion

What makes flying monkey tactics so effective? Social proof and repetition. Dr. Robert Cialdini, in Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, explains how people look to others—especially groups—to gauge what’s real. When multiple family members echo, “You’re being too sensitive,” it’s tempting to believe you’re the problem, not the situation.

Picture this exchange: in a group setting, you raise a past slight. One person says, “I don’t remember it that way.” Another adds, “You always take things too personally.” The chorus builds. Over time, as Dr. Bessel van der Kolk documents in The Body Keeps the Score, repeated invalidation can even alter how trauma is encoded and recalled. The result? A slow erosion of your confidence in your memories, making you easier to manipulate and less likely to speak up.

Breaking the Cycle: Recognizing and Responding

Recognizing flying monkey tactics is the first step to breaking their hold. Lundy Bancroft, in Why Does He Do That?, urges survivors to separate the abuser’s script from their own lived experience. When confronted with reality-twisting phrases, try mentally pausing and asking, “Whose interest does this serve?”

For example, if a friend says, “Maybe you misunderstood,” note how quickly the conversation shifts from the original issue to a critique of your perception. This is not a neutral statement; it’s a maneuver. Pete Walker, writing on complex PTSD, recommends keeping a journal of incidents and your immediate emotional response. This log can serve as a reality anchor when you’re later pressured to rewrite history. In groups, consider disengaging or redirecting: “I remember it differently.” That simple statement can disrupt the cycle without escalating conflict.

What to do with this

You’re not alone in feeling unsettled when flying monkeys distort your reality. These tactics are designed to undermine, but recognizing them is a powerful defense. Hold on to your own memory, document your experiences, and seek allies who honor your truth. Each time you spot one of these phrases, you reclaim a bit of agency. Trust that your story matters—and that with awareness, you can break the cycle of doubt others try to force on you.

---

Want the full reading list? See our 12 Recommended Books on Dark Psychology.

This post contains Amazon Associates affiliate links. If you buy through them we earn a small commission at no additional cost to you.